10/18/2021 / By Ethan Huff
It is now becoming common knowledge that the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) did not magically appear at a Wuhan wet market, but rather was an invention tied to the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.
Tony Fauci, Shi “batwoman” Zhengli, Bill Gates and various other career criminals each played a role in hatching the idea of covid for the purpose of plunging the world into total chaos and medical fascism.
Even the mainstream media now admits that the official story makes no sense, and that the Chinese Virus was deliberately created as opposed to just appearing out of the blue as a product of nature.
We now know that Fauci funneled millions of American taxpayer dollars to China to conduct illegal gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses – this is an undeniable fact.
A year and a half ago, anyone who suggested any of this was labeled a crazy “conspiracy theorist.” Now, the conspiracy theory is believing that bat soup caused the plandemic.
The Washington Post is one of the corporate media outlets that published leaked intelligence supporting the lab leak hypothesis. The World Health Organization (WHO) also now agrees that Chinese Germs probably did not come from bat meat.
The New Yorker also published what is perhaps the most detailed account of the controversy to date, revealing that — from the beginning — the virus “appeared like a human virus.”
Scripps Research infectious disease expert Kristian Andersen has been confused from the very start about how the Fauci Flu could have spread so rapidly around the world when coronaviruses are not very good at transferring from human to human, let alone from bat to human.
“It seemed to be locked and loaded for causing the pandemic,” Andersen is quoted as saying, his suggestion sounding a lot like the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was concocted by humans, not nature.
“This, almost from day one, appeared like a human virus.”
At the time, Andersen was eager to share his thoughts with Fauci, whom he believed to be an honest and trustworthy doctor. We now know, however, that Fauci is anything but honest and trustworthy.
In his letter, Andersen told Fauci that the SARS-CoV-2 genome seemed “inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.” A “really small part” of the virus had “unusual features,” Andersen added.
“Its spike – the crucial bit of surface protein that a coronavirus uses to invade a cell – appeared able to bind tightly to a human-cell receptor known as ACE2,” Anderson explained, adding that this means “it’s more effective at infecting human cells.”
Another significant trait was a rare insertion into the genome of 12 nucleotides, also known as a furin cleavage site, which may have made the virus more transmissible, Andersen said.
“One has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered,” he added.
Fauci, of course, denies everything. Even though the evidence is everywhere to convict him – and painfully so – Fauci continues to lie, lie and lie some more whenever pressed for answers to the glaring anomalies that demarcate his plandemic narrative.
Strangely enough, Andersen changed his tune not long after making all these statements and inquiries to Fauci. Andersen later said that the notion of the Fauci Flu being concocted in a laboratory was a “crackpot” idea, and that natural transmission makes the most sense.
“A month or two after it surfaced, one guy that studied it early said it had HIV in it,” added a Zero Hedge commenter to the conversation – and keep in mind that Fauci was obsessed with AIDS back in the 1980s. “He said no way that’s in there unless it was put there. All I needed to hear!”
The latest news about Chinese Virus deception can be found at Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under: big government, biological weapon, China, conspiracy, COVID, deception, Fauci, infections, Journalism, lab origin, mainstream media, outbreak, Plandemic, SARS-CoV-2, spike protein, truth, Wuhan
COPYRIGHT © 2018 DECEPTION.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Deception.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Deception.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.