11/20/2023 / By Ethan Huff
Did you know that the British Medical Journal (BMJ) published an editorial calling on doctors everywhere to redirect their focus away from patient care and onto climate change?
Just ahead of the COP26 gathering in Glasgow back in 2021, the BMJ op-ed was released to seed the medical profession with the myth that caring for patients contributes significantly to “greenhouse gas emissions,” the suggestion being that patients should simply be allowed to die in order to save the planet.
Only if “health professionals” can learn how to reduce “overdiagnosis” and “overtreatment” can the medical profession at large adapt to a changing climate, the editorial claims, suggesting that letting more patients die will help to “cool” the planet and prevent it from “warming.”
“Let’s get this straight: The medical establishment wants to cut back on diagnosing cancer early in order to save Big Ben from disappearing under 100-foot waves a week on Wednesday,” writes Vernon Coleman about the ridiculousness of the editorial’s position. “This is terrifyingly wicked.”
(Related: The war on carbon is a major tenet of the climate cultists’ psychotic mass suicide cult.)
Increasing rates of chronic illness due to genetically modified organisms (GMOs), vaccines, 5G and other societal poisons are to take a back seat to the mythical concept of climate change, the medical establishment now claims, arguing that “the climate emergency is the true health crisis of our time.”
Amazingly, the same BMA that published the above-linked editorial also claims that Great Britain needs 60,000 more doctors – for what, we would ask, if climate change is the true priority?
Perhaps the goal of bringing in more doctors to the National Health Service (NHS), the United Kingdom’s government-controlled health care system, is to use them as Dr. Kevorkian types to get rid of patients in order to “save the planet?”
Coleman would seem to agree, having written in a recent piece that the medical profession of today at large “is complicit in the government’s attack on the people it is paid to serve” – especially since the government has made it abundantly clear that it “does not want older, experienced, independent-minded doctors working in Britain,” he says.
No, what the government of the UK wants is a new army of fake medical professionals who will obey every anti-human order passed down to them by their overlords, all in the name of protecting the planet against greenhouse gas destruction.
In fact, the General Medical Council (GMC) has made it a point to drive out the older, more experienced doctors so they can be replaced with a new breed of medical lackeys, “thereby making it easier to destroy the NHS, to kill vast numbers of elderly and sick patients and to push through the rebranded flu hoax and the associated fraud involving an experimental injection.”
“Maybe the Government realised that older, more experienced doctors, not bound by an NHS contract, without mortgages to pay and without future careers to worry about, might be more likely to question the whole rebranded flu hoax,” Coleman further writes in his newest book, “Truth Teller: The Price.”
“It is noteworthy that most of the few doctors objecting to the fraud have been older and more experienced physicians.”
The very idea of “net zero,” which is being heavily pushed right now throughout the West, implies the near-total eradication of human beings from the planet. This aligns with the Agenda 2030 plan to massively depopulate the world, leaving behind a much-smaller slave class to serve the globalists’ every whim.
More of the latest news about the global warming psy-op can be found at Climate.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
bad doctors, BMJ, British Medical Journal, climate change, Collapse, conspiracy, COP26, dangerous doctors, deep state, depopulation, doctors, global warming, Globalism, green, Medicine, NHS, patients, United Kingdom
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 DECEPTION.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Deception.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Deception.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.