07/26/2024 / By Ethan Huff
Paul from Legally Armed America released a video this week presenting compelling evidence about a second gunman who may have been involved in the July 13, 2024, assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Penn.
A degreed engineer with 30 years of professional experience by the name of John who is close with Paul told him that there was more than one shooter in Butler who was there to take out Trump.
John shared a series of slides with Paul, the first of which shows a possible second shooting location on one of the one-story buildings to the left of the stage, if you were looking directly at the stage, to where Trump was speaking. His second slide shows the one-story building as presented by ABC News being the location of Thomas Matthew Crooks, the alleged shooter, which is not where Crooks was later declared to have been positioned.
“I can’t speak to why they put him there,” John commented. “And that’s one of the things that is hard for me to reconcile is the position where they’re putting him … to the far right of the first-floor window.”
“I also saw an image where his deceased body, from ABC News, to the left of that one-floor building. So I had thought that the Secret Service had taken him out with a single shot to the head from the position where they were shooting, so why were news organizations showing him to the far right of the one-story building?”
(Related: Close friend of the Biden Crime Family and current Secret Service head Kim Cheatle admits total responsibility for failed security at Trump’s Butler rally.)
Multiple eyewitnesses have also come forward to claim that they saw a second shooter at the Trump rally fire down from the nearby water tower, located just to the southwest of the American Glass Research (AGR) building from which Crooks reportedly fired at Trump.
The person on the water tower was shot and killed, but the person on the AGR rooftop, reportedly Crooks, was not yet able to be taken down at that moment which is why Trump’s security detail wanted him off the stage and out of sight immediately.
Another person, a woman, came forward to say that she and her daughter-in-law were behind a fence where they spotted one shooter by the fence, presumably the building by the fence, and another on the water tower – watch the video below:
Another angle showing a possible second shooter on the water tower can be viewed below:
?#BREAKING NEW FOOTAGE INDICATED THERE IS ANOTHER SHOOTER INVOLVED.
you can see someone in the top of the water tower .
The Water tower, where the suspected 2nd shooter was located during Trump’s rally, is now blocked off with a police presence
Source: @legislationpage pic.twitter.com/DYdMgZ1oJn
— Johncast (@johncastnow) July 18, 2024
FBI Director Christopher Wray told U.S. senators in a briefing that Crooks had not only set up a remote detonator full of explosives in a nearby parked vehicle but was also using “encrypted communications” to coordinate the plot with someone else.
“Who was he communicating with?” asked Robin Westenra on her “Seemorerocks” Substack. “What frequency? What encryption code? Worse, the so-called ‘remote detonator’ would have had to be used while Crooks was atop a metal roof – which would have absorbed / scattered radio emissions.”
“Interestingly, it was several seconds after Crooks allegedly opened fire that he was shot by Secret Service / law enforcement snipers. Why so long? Were they waiting for him to press the detonator button?”
All Trump-related news updates can be found at Trump.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
active shooter, assassination, big government, Butler, conspiracy, deception, deep state, Donald Trump, false-flag, gun violence, insanity, rigged, second shooter, Secret Service, shootings, Suppressed, truth, Twisted, violence
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 DECEPTION.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Deception.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Deception.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.