12/21/2023 / By Ethan Huff
A federal judge is going to bat for the corrupt U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by telling the federal agency that it can withhold from the public Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccine” safety data for at least another six months due to meeting the criteria of “exceptional circumstances.”
According to lawyers representing the FDA, the agency is currently “overburdened by court orders” concerning the procuring of records about how and why it decided to emergency use authorize (EUA), and later approve, the mRNA (modRNA) COVID jabs from Pfizer and Moderna.
The FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research claims it is “dealing with an unprecedented workload” that is causing the agency to experience “specific and unprecedented hardships.” Because of this, the FDA has requested an 18-month “pause” in the processing of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests pertaining to COVID jab safety data.
The issue arose after the non-profit group Informed Consent Action Network sued the FDA after the agency declined to provide any of these requested materials. The FDA continues to stonewall all requests about COVID jab safety despite a continued surge in excess deaths and serious injuries stemming from the FDA-authorized and FDA-approved shots.
It is now known that hundreds of safety signals for COVID jabs were detected by government employees who never bothered to take a closer look at any of them. Instead, the FDA and other regulatory bodies ignored the signals and rushed the jabs into commercial use at warp speed.
“Unfortunately, I would have to conclude that because of the extraordinary orders that have been issued by the courts down in Texas … requiring just an exorbitant amount of document production within a relatively short period of time, considering the number of documents involved and all of the other litigation I know that agencies have, I would have to conclude that extraordinary circumstances have been established,” stated U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton at a November 20 hearing in Washington, D.C.
(Related: Thanks to vaccines, human life expectancy is on the decline.)
Judge Walton’s ruling means the FDA can continue to hide the truth from the public, including by refusing to upload all relevant data to the government-run Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
VAERS is highly manipulated, as you may already well know, because the FDA and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) keep a lid on what and how much gets reported there in order to keep the public in the dark and deter “vaccine hesitancy.”
Even though the FDA’s job duties include assuring the quality and safety of vaccines, pharmaceuticals and the food supply, Judge Walton has decided that the FDA is simply too overworked right now to adequately do its job, and that the American public must continue to wait for the truth to come later.
“They have the monopoly in their field as a licensing agency and without their approval, it is illegal to offer a product for sale or use among society,” reported The Exposé about the FDA racket that controls food, drugs and vaccines in the United States.
“What this means is they have the final say regardless of whether they have made errors in their assessments and approvals. It is obvious to many of us that the FDA approved COVID vaccinations and ignored not only the lack of necessity or efficacy but also their safety and they should be made to show all of the data that allowed them to make such a reckless decision to approve them.”
The latest news about what the FDA is up to can be found at FDA.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
big government, Big Pharma, Censored Science, conspiracy, corruption, covid-19, deception, FDA, Food and Drug Administration, health freedom, Moderna, outrage, Pfizer, Records, Reggie Walton, rigged, Suppressed, vaccine damage, vaccine injury, vaccine wars, vaccines, VAERS
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 DECEPTION.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Deception.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Deception.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.