X user finds potential SOCK PUPPET account of notorious COVID figure Peter Daszak

The “Florin” (@Florin_Uncovers) X / Twitter account tweeted evidence this week to suggest that infamous Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) kingpin Peter Daszak may run a sock puppet account called “WuhanCoronavirus” (@WCoronavirus) on the same platform.

“So now you have my sequence,” the WuhanCoronavirus account tweeted on Jan. 10, 2020, to which Henry L. Niman, PhD, responded with the following:

“Trop 100 matches for show WH-Human_1|China\2019-Dec is most closely related to two bat SARS-like viruses followed by human in second outbreak, followed by civet cat isolates then human from first outbreak.”

Florin says the WuhanCoronavirus account was created on Jan. 8, 2020, just two days before tweeting to call COVID “my sequence,” and that Daszak is the one, we now know, who is responsible for creating SARS-CoV-2 using U.S. taxpayer grant money from the government.

“He named it Wuhan Coronavirus, referred to SARS2 as ‘my sequence,’ and joked he / it existed to kill stupid people!” Florin tweeted about what Daszak appears to have done.

(Related: Did you know that Ohio attorney Thomas Renz sued Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance for the group’s active participation in the COVID coverup?)

WuhanCoronavirus account trolls Emily Kopp for blowing lid on COVID lies

The WuhanCoronavirus X / Twitter account is still active today, it turns out. On Nov. 10, 2024, for instance, it responded to a tweet from Emily Kopp, who recently gave a lecture at Georgetown University about “how scientific institutes betrayed the public’s trust on COVID’s origins and how they can earn it back.”

Kopp successfully made the case during her presentation that both misinformation studies and social media censorship are responsible for leading the public astray concerning the truth about COVID and where it came from – but WuhanCoronavirus got defensive about this.

“I hope they have a speaker next week to balance out the one-sided interpretation of every data point you attempted to present,” the WuhanCoronavirus account responded scornfully to Kopp.

Florin presents the following two “big clues” to support the idea that WuhanCoronavirus is just Daszak in disguise:

1) The WuhanCoronavirus account only follows the account of ProMed, which was founded on Dec. 31, 2019, by none other than Daszak. ProMed was the first to make reference to a SARS-related Wuhan pneumonia in circulation.

2) Daszak was one of the first to use the term “Wuhan coronavirus” on X / Twitter, which we still use today as well to reference where the so-called virus probably originated.

“WCoronavirus’ 1st tweet was a Jan 8 article about the new coronavirus, also tweeted by Daszak,” Florin further points out. “It then interacted with Peter’s collaborators Menachery Lab and Laurie Garrett the same time he did. WCoronavirus also defended Rick Bright, Daszak’s friend.”

“When a biosciences account replied to him demanding the SARS2 sequence be published, WCoronavirus responded by joking this would make it easier to find him. Most likely projection since indeed the SARS2 sequence led directly to RaTG13 sampled and studied by Daszak & Shi Zhengli!”

Further evidence that WuhanCoronavirus might be Daszak’s burner account is that on Jan. 13, 2020, which was several weeks before such information went public, the account tweeted that COVID was spreading from human to human, which was new information at the time.

“At the same time Peter Daszak also claimed he highly suspected it was transmitting human to human,” Florin says.

The WuhanCoronavirus account on X / Twitter has since started deleting certain posts, which even further indicts Daszak because now that his feet are being held to the fire, suddenly the account is purging potentially damning information.

“Authorities could find the user data of this account,” Florin says. “It could be used as evidence for admission of guilt. It also means Daszak is not in total denial and might wanna confess.”

More related news coverage can be found at Corruption.news.

Sources for this article include:

X.com

NaturalNews.com