09/28/2023 / By Ethan Huff
The Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) rabbit hole runs deep, one of the latest revelations about it suggesting that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was behind the pandemic from the beginning.
Congressional investigators just dropped a bombshell report about how Tony Fauci was allegedly smuggled into CIA headquarters “without a record of entry” where he “participated in the analysis to ‘influence’ the agency’s COVID-19 investigation.”
Former EcoHealth Alliance scientist Dr. Andrew Huff would know, seeing as how he saw behind the scenes the ways in which the CIA was the one running things through this “front organization.”
Be sure to check out the following interview from Brighteon.com with Dr. Andrew Huff in which he and the Health Ranger discuss bioweapons, DARPA, Wuhan and more:
(Related: What do you think? Will the Biden regime, in partnership with the Chinese Communist Party [CCP], successfully launch COVID 2.0 this fall?)
There is a reason why EcoHealth received a slew of lucrative contracts to perform dangerous experiments on bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China, at the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) not long after the Obama regime banned gain-of-function research here in the United States beginning in 2014.
Just four months prior to that ban, the National Institute of Health (NIH), then run by Francis Collins, shifted its research division to EcoHealth, which we know was headed up by Peter Daszak.
“The research was shielded from government oversight by Fauci’s NIAID, and Daszak was forced to report after the fact that he’d engaged in gain-of-function experiments,” Zero Hedge reports.
In a communique with The Intercept, virologist Jesse Bloom stated about this research that he does not think it is worth the risk, nor does he feel that it is even an appropriate area of research because of what it could unleash upon the world.
“As a virologist, I personally think creating chimeras of SARS-related bat coronaviruses that are thought to pose high risk to humans entails unacceptable risks,” Bloom said.
You may recall that not long after COVID was publicly reported as having “escaped” from somewhere – early on they said it was bat soup at a Wuhan wet market – The Lancet published a screed written and signed by Daszak denying all claims that COVID came from a lab rather than a natural spillover event.
Daszak and his buddies tried to claim that any allegations about COVID being lab-made constitute “conspiracy theories” that everyone must “stand together to strongly condemn.”
Huff tells a much different version of events. He says that after having worked at EcoHealth from 2014 through 2016 and seeing what was going on, he knew as early as December 2019 that COVID “was likely a lab leak.”
“Not only is EcoHealth Alliance a CIA front organization, but the United States of America is primarily responsible for COVID, not China,” he alleges.
Back in January in speaking to Fox Business, Huff further revealed that COVID “was actually a failed intelligence operation” – the suggestion being that it did not exactly go as originally planned by its architects.
“We were actually trading China advanced biotechnology for access to intelligence on their bioweapons laboratory. I believe. I can’t prove that but a number of agencies that I discuss in the book, including Dr. Peter Daszak telling me he worked with the CIA.”
Huff has also written a book called “The Truth About Wuhan” in which he unpacks further the ties between Daszak and EcoHealth, the CIA, and other names and entities embedded within U.S. academic institutions and military installments.
The latest news about COVID can be found at Plague.info.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
Andrew Huff, big government, CIA, conspiracy, corruption, COVID, covid-19, deception, deep state, EcoHealth, EcoHealth Alliance, Fauci, Fauci truth, front organization, investigation, Tony Fauci
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 DECEPTION.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Deception.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Deception.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.